Decoding Dyslexia Arizona
Connect with us!
  • Home
  • A national movement
  • Our beginnings
  • Our goals
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Private evaluators
  • Resources

#SayDyslexia

9/13/2015

6 Comments

 
Picture
Responding to the concerns of parents from across the United States that the word "dyslexia" is not being allowed into the IEP process, a coalition of disability groups recently sent a request to the U.S. Department of Education asking for guidance to be issued on the subject.  Several members of Congress sent a similar request. In response, educator and school groups followed up with a letter expressing concerns about use of the word "dyslexia." 

As parents, we believe use of the word "dyslexia" in public schools helps steer discussions toward timely identification of our children, as well as toward appropriate interventions and accommodations.  For those reasons, Decoding Dyslexia groups in every state in the country recently sent a joint letter asking the U.S. Department of Education to clarify that the word "dyslexia" may be used in IEP meetings and related documents.  

The following is an excerpt from the parent letter:
Our concerns

As parents, we are often told that dyslexia is “not recognized by school districts,” “is just an umbrella term,” “does not exist,"  "is a medical issue,” or “is not something schools are required to diagnose or address."  We are also told in IEP meetings that schools are "not required to put the term dyslexia in IEPs.”  In many cases, we are even told after years of failed efforts at reading instruction, that we may not discuss or include “specific methodologies" in an IEP to address our children's reading struggles.

Rather, more often than not, our children receive only the broad classification of "Specific Learning Disability" or, at best, “Specific Learning Disability in Reading” and are placed in general resource rooms with students who have different issues and needs.  Some of these students with different needs may even fall under the same Specific Learning Disability “umbrella,” while others may have disabilities that fall within entirely different IDEA disability categories.   Our children with dyslexia then receive interventions that are neither peer-reviewed nor targeted to their specific, individual challenges.


For example, a student with good word decoding skills who struggles to comprehend the meaning of print material may have markedly different learning needs from a student who struggles to comprehend print material because of a weakness in decoding.  Both may have the same "Specific Learning Disability" or even "Specific Learning Disability - Reading" label, but their needs are entirely different.  The result is an unnecessary and often indefinite delay in the identification and use of effective "specially designed instruction" and interventions students need and to which they are entitled as part of an appropriate education.

Use of the term “dyslexia” is consistent with the language and intent of the IDEA

The term “dyslexia” is explicitly included in the IDEA as an example of a “specific learning disability."  Accordingly, the use of the term need not, should not, and will not affect faithful application of the individualized determinations the IDEA requires.  The statutory and regulatory provisions of the IDEA would remain unchanged. 

Dyslexia is not a "medical" condition.   Indeed, there are currently no medical procedures available to diagnose or treat dyslexia. Rather, it is a statutorily-provided example of a “Specific Learning Disability,” one which can be identified by appropriately trained school personnel charged with conducting psycho-educational evaluations to determine eligibility for special education services.

Conclusion

The use of the term "dyslexia" in an IEP is necessary, because it would permit parents, students, educators, and experts to “speak the same language.” These key players could then move quickly toward discussing peer-reviewed research and methodologies that address difficulties with phonological processing, word identification, fluency, decoding, and spelling skills.  Use of the term “dyslexia" would provide a compass – not a directive – toward specialized instruction and services to remediate and accommodate identified, individual difficulties.

In light of the concerns we have articulated, those expressed in the CCD letter, and the alarming statistics related to the rate of reading failure throughout the country, the Department’s leadership on this issue is critical.   We respectfully request that you issue guidance stating that the term “dyslexia” may be included in an IEP to help ensure that schools provide an appropriate education to students with dyslexia in a timely manner.

6 Comments
Christine
9/14/2015 05:34:17 pm

This is EXACTLY how I have felt for the past 3 years. Thank you for this post.

Reply
Jill S Keith link
9/15/2015 04:44:53 pm

Great work, #SayDyslexia #TwitterStorm!
This was such an important message. Here's to our kids!

Reply
Madeline Taylor
9/16/2015 04:09:17 pm

Great work THANK YOU!

Reply
Attilia Sawyer
9/17/2015 04:44:27 am

this has been my experience as well with dysgraphia. I would bring in the manual of specific learning disorders to an IEP meeting, review the grades, the testing and evaluations and ask Does he have this condition? I read the definition, it seems to describe the difficulties. Blank stares around the room. Then I would be told he didn't need an IEP because he was too bright. I would ask them to show me where in all the testing that a writing evaluation was part of the evaluation. It wasn't.

Reply
Debbie
9/18/2015 12:44:13 pm

Absolutely and with the word dyslexia not only does it steer the kids with IEPs in the proper direction it will better inform gen ed teachers to change the way things are taught ounce they realize sooo many have dyslexia.

Reply
Cindy
9/18/2015 06:11:22 pm

Interesting even with law changes a Alabama Special Ed County Rep told a parent/teacher that their child wouldn't be treated for dyslexia. Furthermore in my son's IEP meeting the County Rep said, IEP's are up to interpretation." that was their excuse for allowing a teacher to consistently not follow his IEP.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Jenifer Kasten
    Parent of child with dyslexia
    DDAZ Leader of Advocacy and Public Policy

    DISCLAIMER:
    This Web site and blog are for informational purposes only and do not contain legal advice. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal advice. 

    Decoding Dyslexia Arizona is committed to protecting the privacy and confidentiality of all our visitors. We do not collect any information from visitors to our Web site or blog. Visitors are invited to submit comments or questions to us via the Contact Page, and we use the information that is provided to us only to respond to the request and to send the visitor information.

    This site may contain hyperlinks to Web sites operated by parties independent from Decoding Dyslexia Arizona. Such hyperlinks are provided for your reference only. Decoding Dyslexia Arizona does not control such Web sites, and is not responsible for their content. Decoding Dyslexia Arizona's inclusion of hyperlinks to such Web sites does not imply any endorsement of the material on such Web sites or any association with their content. Your access and use of such sites, including information, material, products, and services therein, shall be solely at your own risk. Further, because the privacy policy of this Site is applicable only when you are on this Site or blog, once linked to another Web site, you should read that site's privacy policy before disclosing any personal information.

    Categories

    All
    Decoding Dyslexia
    Dyslexia
    PEN Phoenix
    Raising Special Kids
    SLD
    Specific Learning Disability

    Archives

    July 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    September 2015
    July 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014

    RSS Feed

    SIgn up for email updates
    For Email Marketing you can trust.
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.